Published on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 21:33 (Eleven Media)

Minister Aung Min, MPC leader, and member Hla Maung Shwe at Ruili talks on March 11 (Photo-Nay Tun Naing/EMG)
The Myanmar Peace Center is 
facing mounting calls for it to publicly release its financial records, 
following a rumour that a center director receives an annual salary of 
US$120,000, but center staff said they have no authority to do so.
“We are mainly responsible for office 
work,” Kyaw Soe Hlaing, an administrative worker at the peace center 
told Eleven Media, directing further questions to presidential spokesman
 Ye Htut. “We have no authority to [release financial information]. We 
individual staff don’t have the authority as peace processes are 
arranged by the President’s Office,” he said.
Staff at Ye Htut’s office said they 
could not reply to questions from Eleven Media because he was 
accompanying President Thein Sein on a foreign trip.
Calls for financial transparency were sparked by a rumour on social media that a director at the center earns US$120,000 a year.
Although the director flatly denied the 
Facebook rumour, several leaders of armed ethnic groups as well as 
political analysts subsequently called on the center to disclose how 
much funding it receives and how this money is spent.
HOW MUCH MONEY?
EU President José Manuel Barroso announced US$900,000 in initial funding and $38.5million more this year for the Myanmar Peace Center at its opening last November. The center, which was established by an order of the president, also receives funding from Norway.
EU President José Manuel Barroso announced US$900,000 in initial funding and $38.5million more this year for the Myanmar Peace Center at its opening last November. The center, which was established by an order of the president, also receives funding from Norway.
Myanmar’s peace process is, for the most
 part, funded by international donors. Two main donor groups, the Peace 
Donor Support Group and the Myanmar Peace Support Initiative, channel 
funds from western and international agencies into the peace process. 
Both are led by the Norwegian government, with the Peace Support 
Initiative focused on coordinating aid. Japan’s Nippon Foundation also 
funds the peace process. 
The Peace Donor Support Group comprises Australia, Britain, the EU, the United Nations and the World Bank. It pledged $30 million in aid for Myanmar’s peace efforts last June. The Myanmar Peace Support Initiative will reportedly provide more than $70 million.
The Peace Donor Support Group comprises Australia, Britain, the EU, the United Nations and the World Bank. It pledged $30 million in aid for Myanmar’s peace efforts last June. The Myanmar Peace Support Initiative will reportedly provide more than $70 million.
The Nippon Foundation contributed more 
than $300 million to refugees in Kachin and Kayin states through the 
Myanmar Peace Center last year. It also provides funds to the United 
Nationalities Federal Council, a coalition of ethnic parties and armed 
ethnic groups.
Council spokesman Colonel Khun Okka said
 it had signed a cooperation agreement with the Nippon Foundation. The 
foundation gives money to help “arrange meetings, tours and 
consultations”, said Khun Okka who is also chairman of the Pao National 
Liberation Organisation. “The foundation usually holds meetings in 
Japan. The assistance from Norway and the EU mainly goes to the Myanmar 
Peace Center. The Nay Pyi Taw government spends no money. Its budget 
does not describe how much will be spent on the ongoing peace efforts. 
The government itself admits to that,” he said.
Colonel Khun Oakka said that the Myanmar
 Peace Center’s quasi-governmental status raised concerns. “The actions 
of the Myanmar Peace Center are semi-official. Actually, these matters 
should be dealt with in Parliament. A committee or an investigation 
body, after it has been formed by the government, must forward any 
important issue to Parliament in accord with the law. It is better to 
seek approval of Parliament. But the Myanmar Peace Center was formed 
with a special order from the president,” he said.
Khun Oakka also said the peace center 
had lost its neutrality. “In the beginning, it defended its role without
 showing bias, but now it has swayed to one side. It has become a member
 of the government’s Union Level Peace Working committee,” he said.

KIA's Maj-Gen Gwan Maw and MPC members at Ruili talks on March 11 (Photo-Nay Tun Naing/EMG)
OPAQUE FUNDING COULD CAUSE ‘CONFUSION’
Political columnist Dr. Yan Myo Thein said that a lack of transparency could cause misunderstanding and confusion, pointing out that the funding for peace relies on international donors and does not show up in the government’s budget.
Political columnist Dr. Yan Myo Thein said that a lack of transparency could cause misunderstanding and confusion, pointing out that the funding for peace relies on international donors and does not show up in the government’s budget.
“I think it is especially important to 
have transparency in financial matters. The money coming from Norway, 
the EU and other countries is not for the Myanmar Peace Committee as 
well as for the government’s peace committee, it is for the country and 
the people,”  Yan Myo Thein said. “A certain body formed by the 
government or other organisations has to spend that money on behalf of 
the nation and people. So, it is necessary to keep clear accounts for 
income and expenses, which need to be made public. Otherwise, there will
 be confusion,” he said.
Ye Ni, manager of the Irrawaddy News 
Agency’s Yangon office, said that the government lacked transparency in 
foreign aid in general.  “At present, we can say that the peace center 
lacks transparency in its spending. Reports should be released even if 
they are not in detail,” he said.
A spokesman for a Shan political party 
said armed ethnic groups were monitoring the peace center. “We are 
watching what it is doing. Financial matters should be transparent. If 
not, there may be allegations in the future that the donated funds are 
being misappropriated in the name of peace efforts,” said Moe Sai La, 
spokesman for the Shan State Progressive Party and Shan State Army.
Lamai Gwan Ja, member of Kachin State’s 
Peace Creation Group, said that if peace talks were unsuccessful there 
could be misunderstanding and confusion about the peace center’s role. 
The group has brokered peace talks between the government and the Kachin
 Independence Organisation on seven occasions, spending more than 200 
million kyats of its own funds. Its members raised the funds among 
themselves, Lamai Gwan Ja said.
There are also concerns that the peace 
process funded by international donors may face outside interference, 
following reports that China interfered in last month’s peace talks 
between the government and the Kachin Independence Organisation in the 
Chinese border town of Ruili. China brokered that set of talks.   
Yan Myo Thein also said the government should include spending on peace in its budget.
Yan Myo Thein also said the government should include spending on peace in its budget.
“I think the government’s budget should 
cover expenses for the nation’s own peace process,” he said. “The 
acceptance of international funding should be transparent. Moreover, 
there should not be political and personal benefits behind the funding. 
Another thing is that one should not overwhelm or interfere in the peace
 processes because one provides funds. It is necessary to carry out the 
peace processes independently,” Yan Myo Thein said.
The Myanmar Peace Center was established
 on November 3 last year. It is led by Aung Min, vice-chairman of the 
Union Level Peace Working Committee. Its members include two union 
ministers, Soe Thein and Khin Yi, and several representatives of 
nongovernmental organisations: Dr. Kyaw Yin Hlaing, Hla Maung Shwe, Kyaw
 Soe Hlaing, Aung Naing Oo and Dr. Min Zaw Oo.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment